Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /home/webdocs-subsites/news/site/assets/cache/FileCompiler/site/templates/_init.php on line 36

Deprecated: substr(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/webdocs-subsites/news/site/assets/cache/FileCompiler/site/templates/_init.php on line 36
Faculty for Chemistry and Pharmacy- Gene regulation: Shaping up to make the cut

Gene regulation: Shaping up to make the cut

Nov 03, 2016

Before RNA copies of genes can program the synthesis of proteins, the non-coding regions are removed by the spliceosome. Munich researchers report that distinct conformations of a member of this molecular complex play a vital role in the process.


The large subunit of U2AF binds to the mRNA precursor. Picture: Christoph Hohmann, NIM

Ribonucleic acids – RNAs for short – serve as intermediates in the ordered translation of the hereditary information stored in the DNA into blueprints for the synthesis of specific proteins. In the cell nucleus, defined segments of the DNA are first transcribed into RNA copies called messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNAs). In many cases, these primary transcripts contain interspersed sequences that interrupt the actual protein-coding sequence. These “introns” must be removed and the coding sequences spliced before the information can be used for protein synthesis. Indeed, a given gene may encode for several different forms of a protein by a process called alternative splicing, which plays an important role in post-transcriptional gene regulation – for differently spliced mRNA strands code for different protein forms that may also differ in their function. All splicing operations are carried out by a complex molecular machine in the cell nucleus, which is referred to as the spliceosome. Researchers led by Professor Don Lamb at the Department of Chemistry at LMU and Professor Michael Sattler (Helmholtz Zentrum München und Technical University of Munich (TUM)) have now shown that the distinct structural configurations adopted by a protein which is essential for assembly of the spliceosome on mRNA precursors have a critical influence on splicing efficiency. The new findings appear in the latest edition of the journal PNAS.

The spliceosome found in human cells is made up of many different subunits, which must be assembled onto the mRNA precursor in a series of carefully choreographed steps. The binding specificity of individual subunits is crucial for both spliceosome assembly and function. “The assembly factor we have studied, called the U2 Auxiliary Factor or U2AF for short, is critical for the correct recognition of the splicing sites at one end of the introns,” says Lena Voithenberg, first author of the new paper. U2AF itself is made up of two different subunits. In its free form, the larger of the two is a highly dynamic protein, as Voithenberg and her colleagues demonstrated by means of single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Experiments using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy carried out in parallel at the Bavarian Center for NMR (run jointly by the Helmholtz Zentrum München and the TUM) provided further information relating to the structure and conformational dynamics of U2AF.

“We found that the large subunit rapidly switches its conformation from an open to a closed structure on timescales of micro- to milliseconds,” Voithenberg explains. Only the open form can bind to the RNA. – Moreover, the proportion of molecules in this conformation depends on the relative binding affinity of the RNA sequences available: Sequences that show a high affinity for the binding subunit therefore have a higher probability of being recognized – and cleaved – than those with a lower affinity. According to the Munich researchers, their results suggest that the different structural conformations adopted by the large subunit of U2AF serve to regulate the splicing efficiency at different splicing sites. This in turn has obvious implications for how mRNA precursors are cleaved and spliced, which in turn affects not only the structure of the final protein, but also the rate at which it is synthesized.

PNAS 2016